The recent surge of Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) seeking to exploit foreign policies for personal gain, while simultaneously professing their patriotism for India, raises significant questions about the authenticity of their nationalism. A pertinent example is the report of NRIs in the U.S. opting for preterm deliveries to secure birthright citizenship for their children, highlighting a stark contradiction between their proclaimed values and actions.
The reality of ‘Amrit Kaal’ versus NRI choices
India is currently experiencing a transformative phase, often referred to as ‘Amrit Kaal,’ marked by initiatives such as the development of 100 smart cities, technological advancements like UPI and BHIM, and significant cultural events like the Mahakumbh contributing substantial revenue. Despite these developments, many NRIs, who frequently extol India’s progress, choose not to return and participate in this growth. Instead, they remain in foreign countries, seeking the stability and benefits these nations offer.
Birthright citizenship and the moral dilemma
The Trump administration’s executive order aiming to end birthright citizenship has caused considerable concern among Indian immigrants in the U.S. In response, some have considered scheduling preterm deliveries to ensure their children are born before the policy’s implementation date. This desperation underscores a transactional approach to citizenship, where individuals prioritize personal security over genuine national allegiance.
It’s important to note that a federal judge has temporarily blocked this executive order, citing it as “blatantly unconstitutional.” This legal intervention adds another layer to the complex narrative of NRIs navigating foreign policies for personal benefit.
The hypocrisy of NRI patriotism
While NRIs often position themselves as ambassadors of Indian culture abroad, their reluctance to return and contribute to India’s development reveals a preference for the comforts of developed nations. This behavior suggests a lack of confidence in India’s future and highlights a disconnect between their professed patriotism and actual choices.
Factors contributing to this dichotomy
Several reasons may explain this inconsistency:
1. Economic considerations: Many NRIs initially left India in search of better opportunities, and the prospect of higher salaries and superior infrastructure in foreign countries continues to be a significant draw.
2. Systemic challenges in India: Issues such as corruption and bureaucratic inefficiencies can deter NRIs from returning, despite ongoing improvements.
3. Perceived cultural superiority: Exposure to Western lifestyles may lead some NRIs to develop a sense of superiority, resulting in a condescending attitude towards India while still capitalizing on its cultural heritage.
Moving towards authentic nationalism
True patriotism requires more than verbal endorsements; it demands active participation in a nation’s progress and a commitment to addressing its challenges. NRIs possess the resources and global exposure to effect meaningful change in India. Rather than exploiting foreign systems, they should consider contributing to India’s development during this pivotal period.
Bridging the gap between rhetoric and reality
The phenomenon of NRIs seeking advantages abroad while praising India’s virtues reflects a form of superficial nationalism. Encouraging a more genuine form of patriotism—one rooted in action and shared responsibility—can help reconcile this disparity and foster a more authentic connection to India’s future.