Amidst Controversy, Only Half of Registered Candidates Show Up for BPSC Prelims Re-Exam
The recent re-examination conducted by the Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) has sparked controversy and dissent across the state. On January 4, 2025, a mere 50% attendance was recorded for the re-exam of the 70th Combined (Preliminary) Competitive Examination, held in response to allegations of irregularities during the original exam on December 13, 2024. Out of 12,012 registered candidates, only 5,943 actually appeared for the examination conducted at 22 centers throughout Patna. BPSC’s statement asserting that the re-exam was conducted in a “peaceful and misconduct-free environment” stands in stark contrast to the ongoing protests and public outcry regarding the process.
The backdrop of this discontent paints a broader picture involving the quality of the examination, with students voicing their concerns about the adequacy of the question paper that many claimed fell short of the expected standards. Social media platforms are abuzz with criticisms directed at the BPSC, questioning the competence of officials tasked with administering what is considered one of Bihar’s most crucial recruitment examinations.
Who Faced What in the Re-Exam?
The re-examination’s attendance figures reveal significant concerns about candidate participation and engagement. The exam itself spanned a two-hour period from 12 noon to 2 pm, with students able to enter the examination halls until 11 am. Candidates faced negative marking, losing one-third of their marks for incorrect answers. Out of the 12,012 students who obtained admit cards, only 8,111 bothered to download the hall tickets, further hinting at the growing disillusionment among aspirants. According to the data, the pronounced attendance rate of less than 50% raises questions about the examination’s credibility and the BPSC’s ability to inspire confidence in prospective candidates.
The controversy surrounding the re-exam has not only sparked discourse among students but also fueled ongoing protests by aspirants. For over 15 days, students have taken to the streets, staging sit-ins to voice their demands for a fair examination process. Tensions escalated when security forces clashed with protesters outside the BPSC office, resulting in a lathi charge that intensified the existing unrest.
Political Figures Join the Fray
Adding further complexity to the situation is the involvement of notable political figures, including Prashant Kishor, the founder of the Jan Suraaj Party. Kishor, who has become a vocal advocate for the protesting aspirants, initiated an indefinite fast on January 2, urging the authorities to take their concerns seriously. His presence at the protests has drawn attention and spurred further activism among students seeking justice.
However, Kishor’s involvement took a drastic turn when he was arrested at Gandhi Maidan while leading a protest. Notably, he refused to adhere to the conditional bail bond of Rs 25,000 demanded by the authorities, resulting in his transfer to 14-day judicial custody. This shocking development has left many questioning the tactics employed by the police and the government’s approach to dealing with public dissent.
Allegations of Police Misconduct
Following his arrest, Kishor publicly accused the police of misconduct, stating, “From 5-11 am, I was kept in a police vehicle and taken to various places without being informed of my destination.” He further condemned the treatment he received, especially regarding an attempted medical examination which he categorically denied, arguing that he had not committed any criminal act. Kishor’s actions and statements have resonated widely, further stoking the flames of protest and creating a ripple effect of support among aspiring candidates and their allies.
With rising concerns about police handling of protests and the examination process itself, it has become imperative for the BPSC to address student grievances and restore faith in its operation. The BPSC’s reputation is at stake, and failure to engage constructively with students may lead to greater unrest in the future.
Future Implications and Calls for Action
The growing discontent regarding the BPSC’s handling of the examination and subsequent protests highlights systemic issues within the recruitment process. The need for transparency, accountability, and a commitment to maintaining high standards in examinations cannot be overstated. The commission’s failure to mitigate these issues poses significant risks—not only for the candidates but for the stability of Bihar’s administrative system as well.
Students and supporters have rallied around the cause, demanding immediate reform and accountability from BPSC. Moreover, the ongoing protests signify a shift in how aspiring candidates perceive their rights within the examination framework. The public discourse surrounding the exam reflects broader concerns about governance and the quality of public services.
For more information about ongoing protests and student rights, visit our article on Student Rights in Bihar and explore the official communications from the BPSC on their dedicated platform at BPSC Official Website.
As the situation evolves, all eyes remain on the BPSC’s forthcoming actions in addressing the multifaceted issues arising from the recent examination and the protests. The commission must navigate these turbulent waters with a focus on communication, integrity, and fairness to secure the trust of the public.