A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Thursday delivered a split verdict in the Hijab ban case and referred the case to the CJI.
The Supreme Court asked the CJI for his direction to constitute a larger bench to decide the issue. The bar of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia delivered the verdict on a batch of appeals against the Karnataka High Court judgment upholding the hijab ban in educational institutions.
“We have a divergent opinion, I have framed 11 questions on the issue,” Justice Hemant Gupta who led the bench said in his verdict. While dismissing the batch of appeals filed by many students, Justice Gupta affirmed the high court’s order on the hijab ban and said, “The matter be sent to the CJI for constituting a larger bench to hear the case.”
The two-judge bench on September 26, had reserved its order, after hearing from all the parties — 23 petitioners, their lawyers, and the Karnataka government for a marathon 10 days.
The apex court pronounced the verdict on 23 petitions, including Aishat Shifa, and others. The state government has argued in the Supreme Court that it had the authority to issue an order to educational institutions to follow the discipline of wearing the prescribed school uniforms.
Senior advocate Dushyant Dave, appearing for the students/ petitioners, reasoned that fundamental rights, freedom to choose what to wear, and freedom of faith would not diminish inside a classroom.
The lawyers for the students — Devadatt Kamat, Dr Rajeev Dhavan, and Dishyant Dave — submitted in the top court that the Karnataka State government had not presented even a single shred of evidence to support their claim that a few students wearing hijab to their classrooms in addition to their respective uniforms violated public order, health, and morality.
The lawyers further said that the Karnataka government had not provided any material to support their claim that wearing a hijab infringed on the fundamental rights of other students.
A Full Bench of the Karnataka High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit, and Justice J M Khazi, in their judgment on March 15, this year, held that wearing of hijab by women was not an essential religious practice of Islam.
The high court’s three-judge bench had dismissed the petitions filed by a group of Muslim girl students against PU government college for denying them entry while wearing Hijab. Led by Chief Justice Awasthi dismissed the petition stating that the practice of hijab is not an essential practice under Islam and thus does not fall within the ambit of Article 25 of the Constitution of India.
The High court also held that the prescription of school uniforms is only a reasonable restriction that is constitutionally acceptable which the students cannot object to and stated that the government had the power to issue such notification and that no case was made out against the government notification.
‘A Matter Of Choice, Girls’ Education Most Important Question’ says Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia While Setting Aside Karnataka Hijab Ban
#SupremeCourtOfIndia #hijab
Why there is still some hope left for India! https://t.co/AenjfJszfQ
— Ashok Swain (@ashoswai) October 13, 2022